Queens vs LinkedIn Queens

Queens vs LinkedIn Queens: Free Region-Logic Puzzle Compared

Both games use the same core rule set: one crown per row, one per column, one per colored region, and no two crowns touching, even diagonally. The puzzle logic is identical. What differs is what stands between you and the board.

The short verdict

If you want the exact Queens ruleset without opening LinkedIn, and you want to keep playing after the daily board, Queens is the straightforward pick. Play LinkedIn Queens if you're already logged in there daily and like having it alongside your feed.

Play Queens free

Queens vs LinkedIn Queens at a glance

QueensLinkedIn Queens
Core ruleOne crown per row, column and region, no touchingOne crown per row, column and region, no touching
Account requiredNoYes, a LinkedIn account
Practice modeUnlimited, free, any timeNone — daily puzzle only
Board sizes7×7 free, 9×9 for ProVaries by day, fixed size
TimerBuilt-in, ranks the leaderboardTimer only, no ranking
Solution guaranteeEvery board solver-verified as uniquely solvable before publishingEditorially set
ArchiveLast 30 days (Pro)Not available
PriceFree, no signupFree with a LinkedIn account

Why the region shapes matter more than the grid lines

Plain N-queens — one crown per row and column, nothing else — has thousands of valid layouts on a normal board. Adding the region and adjacency rules collapses that down to exactly one. In both games, the region boundaries are doing almost all the real work: a region confined to a single row or column tells you immediately where its crown belongs, and that one deduction usually cascades through half the board.

What no-account access actually changes

LinkedIn Queens sits behind a professional-network login, which is a real barrier if you just want a five-minute puzzle on a work break without opening LinkedIn itself. Queens plays the identical rule set with nothing to sign into, and unlimited practice mode means you're not limited to one board before tomorrow.

Difficulty and board size

A 7×7 board is a comfortable five-minute daily; the 9×9 tier adds two more rows, columns and regions to satisfy simultaneously, which is a meaningfully bigger search space, not just a bigger grid. If a standard board stops taking you more than a couple of minutes, that's the signal to move up.

Play Queens if…

  • You want the Queens ruleset without a LinkedIn account
  • You want unlimited practice, not one board a day
  • You want a harder 9×9 tier once the standard board gets easy

Play LinkedIn Queens if…

  • You're already logged into LinkedIn daily and like it alongside your feed
  • You don't mind a single fixed board size

Queens vs LinkedIn Queens: frequently asked questions

Is Queens the same as LinkedIn Queens?

The core rules match exactly — one crown per row, column and region, no two touching, even diagonally. Puzzle Theory's version needs no account, adds unlimited free practice, and includes a timer and leaderboard.

Do I need a LinkedIn account to play Queens?

Not on Puzzle Theory. The daily board and unlimited practice mode are both free with no account of any kind required.

Is there a harder version of Queens?

Yes. Hard mode uses a 9×9 board with nine regions instead of the free 7×7 tier — more rows, columns and regions to satisfy at once.

Does every Queens board have exactly one solution?

Yes. Boards are generated and then checked with a solver that confirms a single arrangement satisfies every rule before the puzzle is ever shown to a player.

Can I play more than one Queens board a day?

Yes. Beyond the shared daily board, practice mode generates new boards instantly and without limit.

Keep reading

Other comparisons